I argue that fertility may be a strategic choice for ethnic groups engaged in redistributive conflict. I first present a simple conflict model where high fertility is optimal for each ethnic group if and only if the economy’s ethnic diversity is high, institutions are weak, or both. I then test the model in a cross-national dataset. Consistent with the theory, I find that economies where the product of ethnic diversity and a measure of institutional weakness is high have increased fertility rates. I conclude that fertility may depend on political factors.I'm skeptical of the cross-national empirics without having looked at them, because ... they are cross-national empirics (see here for further explanation). But the theory is interesting and sounds plausible.
(And here's the link for the paper by Thorsten Janus, forthcoming in Public Choice)
Link?
ReplyDeletecheers, added above
ReplyDeletePlus: sounds plausible??
ReplyDeleteGood point. Sounds plausible somewhere like South Sudan, but perhaps not in a global cross-country dataset......
ReplyDeleteHi there! This blog post couldn't be written any better! Reading through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He continually kept preaching about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a very good read. I appreciate you for sharing!
ReplyDeletemy web-site: bvefejleszto.weboldala.net/user/profile/leonoruey/